Monday, January 31, 2011

Childhood Poverty in America


Building off of my previous post and the discussion in the comments, here is some data on poverty among children in America. Keep in mind that most of this data was taken from the Census Department's Current Population Survey (unless otherwise noted) and does not count undocumented immigrants - the population most at risk for poverty.

  • Children make up 26 percent of our country's population, but they are 39 percent of the people who live in poverty. Every day, 2,660 children are born into poverty in America.
  • 19 percent of all children in the United States officially live in "poverty". That means that 14 million American children live below the government's ridiculously low poverty line of $22,050 per year for a family of FOUR.
  • Research shows that, on average, families need an income of about twice the poverty level just to get by. 41 percent of all American children live in what the government classifies as "low-income households" - for 2009 that was $44,100 for a family of FOUR.
  • 8 percent of children officially live in extreme poverty, classified as at or below 50 percent of the official poverty line. That's 6.2 million American children existing off of less than $11,000 per year for a family of FOUR.
  • 11 percent of white children live in poor families. 35 percent of black children live in poor families. 15 percent of Asian children live in poor families. 31 percent of American Indian children live in poor families. And 31 percent of Hispanic children live in poor families.
  • 41 percent of Hispanic children in North Carolina live under the poverty line, and that's not counting the vast majority of Hispanics in this state illegally.
  • When you consider not just children living under the official poverty line, but also children in "low-income" families, 61 percent of black and Hispanic kids live in families that ain't getting by.
Poverty, especially childhood poverty, isn't what you think it is:
  • 55 percent of children living in poor or low-income families have a parent who works full time year round. 26 percent of these children have parents that work part time.
  • Only 20 percent have parents that do not work.
  • 51 percent of poor and low-income families are headed by a single mom, but 36 percent have married parents. (NCCP study)
  • One in five children born to migrant families are poor, while just 14 percent of native-born children are. And keep in mind, this is only legal/documented migrants.
  • Parental education levels for children in poverty vary, but 36 percent have a high school diploma and only one-quarter, 7.3 million parents, have less than a high school education. Nearly 40 percent of parents with poor and low-income classified children have completed at least some college.
And the kicker...

These statistics are from 2008 and do not take into account the full impact of the recession
. The situation today is probably much much worse.
"Between August 2008 and August 2009, the number of people receiving food stamps, or what are now called SNAP benefits, increased by 7.0 million, or 24 percent, as monthly caseloads skyrocketed from 29.5 to 36.5 million participants. This extraordinary increase means that roughly 3.4 million more children were receiving SNAP benefits in August 2009 than a year earlier, based on data showing that almost half (49 percent) of SNAP participants are children." (Brookings Institution - Jan 2010)

9 comments:

The Last Unitard said...

I just wrote out a long comment, half snark and half vicious invective, but I deleted it.

The gist is, I spent about half my childhood and adolescence under the poverty line, sometimes WAY under, and I turned out fine.

I applaud those who are smart enough to figure out how to live. I don't have much pity for those who aren't.

I like to think that the dumbest people will eventually lose the ability to reproduce, because it's simply better for the species if they don't.

Rach said...

I have to second the Unitard. I don't think I was ever below the poverty line, but I definitely wasn't much above it. It sucks for the kids to be born on the wrong side of luck, and it's harsh, but maybe they shouldn't have been born in the first place. If you can't afford a kid, don't have a kid. Overpopulation debate anyone?

willis said...

Just because you grew up poor doesn't mean you grew up in poverty. The data referenced in this post is for the federal government's poverty line which is a specific threshold that I would be very surprised if you lived under for a majority of your youth. Tens of millions of poor people earn too much to be designated as officially "in poverty". And qualifying for government assistance does not mean that your family lived in official poverty since most gov't programs take families earning up to 150 and sometimes 300 percent of the poverty line.

Also, way to go all Ayn Randian on the blog, dude. Applaud?

The Last Unitard said...

This is the perfect segue for me to introduce my eugenics program!

I will personally sterilize every American of breeding age that I deem unworthy of making new Americans.

In 20 years I'll have the gene pool spic n' span!

And a bonus for people who don't qualify for reproduction but still want to have the child rearing experience: State Subsidized Adoption! That's right, we'll find you an orphan and give you enough money to take care of it, and if you do a good job, maybe we'll consider untying your tubes. Don't get your hopes up, though!

willis said...

You two argue in one post that income inequality isn't a big problem in America and then, in this post, make the case that it is fine that 40% of American children probably shouldn't be born because their parents don't earn enough.

Got it.

The Last Unitard said...

Yes, I think you would be surprised.

I find that upsetting.

The Last Unitard said...

Relax. You're a serious humanist and I'm an absurd darwinist. I know about as much about politics as you do about the 1989 San Francisco Giants.

I know you posted these things with the hope of serious debate. I'm sorry I cannot provide it.

Rach said...

I didn't say inequality wasn't a problem, I said life isn't nearly as bad as in other places.
It's sad that poor kids are poor, but if 40% of poor kids weren't born because their parents couldn't afford it, there would be fewer poor kids. And that would be good.

palejoe said...

I'm with Willis here on this one, folks.
You can share your own experiences and suggest all a manner of population control to resolve the issue but the statistics are right there and, lets remember, those are the rosy ones that don't include the recession or undocumented migrants.

Whether these children have it truly terrible and what may or may not constitute extreme poverty doesn't negate the fact of their existence. These kids are growing up with shit educations from shit schools, shit diets, and shit-all opportunity for decent employment.

Will some of them turn out alright and beat the odds similar to our fellow shirkers here? Of course. Nothing about their social situation is absolute and it's disingenuous to claim so. It's important to keep in mind though that those kids getting out of poverty are exceptions to the rule and not living embodiments of the American Dream.